World War II Liberation of Greece: British Landings (October 1944)

Figure 1.–This RAF photograph was taken October 5, 1944. The caption reads, «RAF lands in Greece: The first arrival on the mainland of Greece of our firces, which included British labd forces and units of the Royal Air Force Regiment; met with a wildly enthusiastic welcome from the inhabitants. On a beach in Greece, BAC. Frank Harper, 160 Canongate, Edinburgh (left), and BAC Edward Carswell, Ivy Cottage, Stanley, Stoke-on-Trent, members of the RAF Regiment, share their early morning breakfast rations with a little Greek boy.» He seem to be enjoying breakfast with his new friends. Notice what looks to be a landing craft in the background.

The British Government was concerned about a Communist take over in Greece. The British wanted to invade Greece in early 1944, but were unable to interest the Americans who were focused on Normandy. They planned a series of small actions in the Agean. Operation Accolade focused on the Dodecanese Islands. Operation Hercules was planned to assault Rhodes. Συνέχεια


WW2 Balkan Campaign – Yugoslavia

The Yugoslav army was regarded for one of the strongest in Europe. Its prestige was strengthened by glorious traditions of the Serbian army from two Balkan and the First World wars. That was however the army of ethnically homogeneous Serbia whereas in 1941 the army was comprised of soldiers of multinational Yugoslavia and within its ranks occurred all the contradictions splitting this country.

During the peacetime the Yugoslav army numbered about 150,000 men divided among 20 divisions. Mobilization plans foresaw formation of 31 divisions (28 infantry and 3 cavalry ones) as well as many border, fortress and auxiliary units; altogether 1.7 million men.  This large force had inadequate armaments, especially in anti-tank, anti-aircraft weapons and vehicles (only two tank battalions were available, which possessed only one modern tank). Partially modernized air forces had about 520 aircraft, and smallish navy apart from the Adriatic fleet also had its own air force, coastal defence and a large riverine flotilla.

In Yugoslavia’s situation of March and April 1941 out of about 3060km long land borders only 260km (the border with Greece) could be considered safe. Also the sea border (600km in straight line) was exposed. Due to internal situation as well as to overestimating of combat capabilities the concept of defence along frontiers was assumed. As a result the accepted plan R-41 foresaw that 7/8 of units would be deployed along the borders and only 1/8 would be kept in strategic reserve. The main idea of the plan was an advance against the Italian forces in Albania in order to liquidate them; on other fronts the defence operations had to be held. Under the pressure of prevailing enemy forces the gradual retreat had to be carried out from the north to the south and south-east, starting from Slovenia and up to a possible withdrawal to Greece to deliver there an ultimate defence. In March Yugoslavia had about 600,000 men at arms.

It can be accepted that the Belgrade was kept informed about Hitler’s decision to invade Yugoslavia, concentration of German troops, their strength and possible directions of attack. The coup d’état, which had clearly anti-hitlerite character, urged to speed up war preparations. But the lack of time, complicated internal situation, complicated system of the mobilization itself and the fear to provoke the Germans caused that this cardinal postulate was fulfilled only partially.

Yugoslav events in March 1941 had awakened big expectations in London and Athens. Sir Winston Spencer Churchill believed, that the situation had finally emerged, which would make possible a broader coalition of Great Britain, and three Balkan countries – Greece, Yugoslavia and Turkey. He thought that it would make Hitler to abandon his plans to invade the Balkans and even to deem more promising to seek advantage at the expense of Russia. Therefore operation Lustre, according to him, had gained importance not as a single action but as a basic element of broader strategic plans.

Greece cheered Yugoslav events with spontaneous joy. Demonstrators hailed Yugoslavia in the streets of Greek cities; on the Greek-Yugoslav border fraternization of Greek and Yugoslav soldiers was common. For Gen. Aléxandros Papagos the day 27 March in Belgrade meant fulfilment of hopes to create a strong union of Balkan countries capable to resist a German invasion. He intended to shift troops deployed on Aliakmon river to the vicinity of Salonika. Gen. Henry Maitland Wilson however opposed arguing that one had to have assured first, what would be the actual Yugoslav position. This task was assigned to the foreign minister Sir Anthony Robert Eden and the chief of the Imperial General Staff Gen. Sir John Dill. On 27 March they were in Malta on their way from Athens to England. Both immediately came back to Greece, from where they planned to make for Belgrade after consultations with the Greeks. But Gen. Dušan Simoviæ agreed only for arrival of Gen. Dill, and only incognito. On 31 March and 1 April Gen. Dill had meetings with representatives of the Yugoslav General Staff, in which also took part Gen. Simoviæ and the minister of the army and navy, Gen. Bogoljub Iliæ. Practically the only effect of the talks was an agreement to summon a further meeting of representatives of general staffs of Yugoslavia and Greece and the command of the British Expeditionary Corps. It eventually took place at the night 2/3 April in Greece, on a small border station near Florina. The meeting was held by generals Papagos, Wilson and Radivoje Jankoviæ – the chief of the Operations Division of the Yugoslav General Staff. The meeting had brought little effect: the participants had agreed just upon operational and tactical details.

Gen. Jankoviæ proposed that the Greek troops deployed on the fortification line would remain there, and the British troops would assume defence positions between the Greeks and the Yugoslavs near Lake Dojran and in the valley of river Struma. He was surprised when Gen. Wilson presented the real strength of the British forces in Greece (in Belgrade Gen. Dill had overstated the numbers) and declined a commitment to swiftly deploy British units in the vicinity of Dojran.

As to the Albanian front, Gen. Jankoviæ had stated that the Yugoslavs would undertake there offensive operations with the forces of four divisions, which in case of necessity had to start their activities by 12 April (planned date of their complete concentration). It was agreed that the Yugoslavs would develop advances in directions Podgorica – Shkodra, Prizren – Kukesi and from Debar and Struga westward, where they would co-operate with the Greeks. However neither the date of the beginning of the operation nor the forms of activities’ co-ordination were agreed upon.

Practically it meant that it did not come to establishment of a common strategic plan among Yugoslavia, Greece and Great Britain. Again a situation had occurred so characteristic for the war’s initial period: even if the opponents of the III Reich were going to the fight together, this «coalition» was expressed just in a formal way – the struggle with the same enemy. Besides each ally was acting separately and at its own risk.

Beginning 27 March Yugoslavia was gradually enforcing her combat readiness. On 30 March was ordered full activation (secret mobilization), which had to start on 3 April. On that day to the mobilization centres had to rush reservists, vehicles and transport animals. According to the plan the mobilization had to be completed by 15 April.

In due time about 70-90% of reservists and about 50% of animals had reported to their units. [] The best situation was in Serbia, whereas in Croatia only about 50% of reservists and 10- 15% of animals had reported. Croatian fascists (ustaši) sabotaged the draft to the «Serbian» army and even resorted to violence towards recruits. Also the Croatian Agrarian Party of Dr. Vlatko Maèek assumed negative position. On 27 March the leadership of the party instructed its provincial branches, that reservists would not report to the draft, and animals and vehicles designated for mobilization would be concealed in the woods. It was not until Dr. Maèek entered Gen. Simoviæ’s government (3 April), that the party had formally called upon the Croats to fulfil their patriotic duty.

Further disruption of the mobilization was caused by the decision of the minister of the army and navy from 4 April, which ordered, in face of aggression expected any time, that headquarters and units would immediately rush from mobilization centres to concentration areas regardless of established schedules and routes. Headquarters and units made for frontiers incomplete and some reservists had to seek their troops en route.

Eventually on 6 April Yugoslavia was at the third day of the «general activisation», it means in an initial stage of war preparations. In the areas of concentration of land forces, apart from border and fortress units, had found themselves eleven incomplete divisions. Other headquarters and units were still in their quarters, mobilization centres or under way. The General Staff had remained in Belgrade. Many officers had not reached their units yet, others were yet carrying out reconnaissance and dispatching orders to their subordinates. Air forces and navy were in better condition. In the navy the fleet and the air forces were ready for action, whereas the coastal defence was not yet prepared for combat.

Yugoslavia was entering the war with a unique defence plan ever known during the Second World War – the plan of defence of literally whole vulnerable border, without significant reserves, with armed forces far from combat readiness and politically undermined from inside.

From the formal point of view, allied Greco-Yugoslav-British forces could resist an onslaught of combined fascist forces on some defence line. Practically this option was buried because each of the allies tried to realize its own concepts and to achieve its own goals without having sufficient forces. Dragiša Cvetkoviæ’s government had let to encircle Yugoslavia and Simoviæ’s government, even having engaged maximum energy, was not able to put the armed forces into full combat readiness. The Greek command, having overestimated Yugoslav and own forces, stuck to a great coalition idea and subordinated troops’ deployment to it. The British in first place took precautions to secure retreat routes to the Greek ports.


First shots were fired yet before the midnight on 5 April 1941: German assault groups attacked several object along the Yugoslav borders. At 2:00 a German engineer group took by surprise the Yugoslav side of the Iron Gate and voided the Yugoslav plan to block the shipping on the Danube. At 5:00 German and Italian air forces set off for the action, and at 5:15 started the German attack on Skopje, Veles and Strumica. At 6:30 first aircraft from the German 4th Air Fleet flew over Belgrade.

The raid on Belgrade was conducted in several waves. The weak anti-aircraft artillery fought gallantly until it was overwhelmed. Pilots from the Yugoslav 5th Fighter Regiment, which possessed German planes Messerschmitt Bf-109, also fought gallantly and shot down 10 German machines, but due to the invaders’ superiority they lost 15 planes. It could not save the city bombed by several hundred of aircraft. Entire city quarters were levelled. The gas and electricity supplies were interrupted. At least 20,000 inhabitants died, many more were wounded.The German air forces repeated air raids on the city at the night of 7 April and on 7 and 8 April. Those raids disorganized the work of the Yugoslav administration, which under bombs was leaving in hurry to the places designated by the defence plans. It was not until 21:00 that the government gathered in Uzice to proclaim the general mobilization and to agree upon the appeal to the nation. That appeal though could not be broadcast, because the radio-station in Belgrade was destroyed.

The Supreme Command started its mobilization in the morning in Belgrade and it was not until 15:00 that it reached Banja Kovilaca, from where it attempted to contact subordinated units. Unfortunately, the command’s own signals battalion was not completely mobilized yet, and could not provide a fully operational service. Through the attaché in Athens there was sent an appeal to Gen. Aléxandros Papagos to start an offensive in Albania, and to Gen. Henry Maitland Wilson to start operations in the valley of Strumica.

In Athens it was estimated yet before the midnight that the German aggression was just a matter of hours, and the supreme command readied the troops concentrated on the Bulgarian frontier. At 5:00 the German ambassador, Viktor von Erbach zu Schönberg, demanded an immediate audience from prime-minister Aléxandros Koryzis. The prime-minister understood very well what the Prussian aristocrat in Nazi service was going to bring. He let the German wait 30 minutes, and meanwhile notified the king and the supreme commander. As soon as von Erbach was received, he started reading the note, but Koryzis interrupted saying that Greece would fight. At 6:00 the radio-station in Athens interrupted broadcasting the Sunday religious service, and announced the official communiqué about the German aggression, as well as the king and prime-minister’s declaration. The people’s reaction though this time was different than on 28 October 1940. They realized that it was too difficult for Greece to fight  and to stand another mighty power.

The basic military events of the first, decisive stage of the war took place in south-east Yugoslavia, which played the key role to both sides. Holding there, combined with an offensive in Albania, would influence realization of the Yugoslav defence plan, which foresaw a possibility to retreat towarts the Greek border. To the Greeks it also created possibility to win time till the full concentration of the British Expeditionary Corps; the corps would be then used to support the troops fighting in the first line, or cover their retreat to a new defence position. To the invaders occupation of that area meant separation of the Yugoslav and Greek forces, removing the menace of an Italian defeat in Albania, and creation of the basis for the offensive against Greece along a broad front. So both sides concentrated in that area substantial forces. But the German 12th Army was fully prepared for combat, while the Allies lacked co-ordination and uniform command, and operated in several groupings.

Against south-east Yugoslavia from Bulgaria struck the core of the 12th Army. It focused its effort on three routes leading to Skopje, Veles, and Strumica. Meanwhile the Yugoslav units from the 3rd Army District fought along a wide defence front counting on favourable terrain conditions. But the German assault grouping already on the first day overcame the units detached from Yugoslav divisions to the border defence, and on 7 April their forces took Skopje, Veles and Strumica. The Yugoslav defence became disorganized. Attempts to organize defence on new positions failed due to collapse of the army. Within next three days the Germans met the Italians on the lake Ohrid, and broke the Greek defence in the vicinity of Salonika.

The left wing of the advancing German 12th Army, from the very moment it crossed the Greek border, encountered a stubborn defence of the Army Eastern Macedonia deployed on the system of permanent fortifications. Greek forts’ crews, supported by field units, as a rule used to let the enemies to approach at close distance in order to destroy them with well-organized fire. The strength of such organized defence made the Germans an unpleasant surprise. In most of the sectors their advance stalled and split into a series of fights for individual forts, especially in the areas of Nevrokopion and the Rupel pass. Only on the left wing of the Greek forces in the Kerkini (Bjelasnica) mountains the Germans mounted a substantial superiority in numbers and drove the Greeks to the rear position at Krusia. The overall situation though was determined by the events, which took place in the area of Strumica. Already in the evening of 7 April the command of the Army Eastern Macedonia received from there alarming news about the enemy successes, and on 8 April from there struck the enemy 2nd Armoured Division.

It rolled the Greek rear troops, and before evening reached Salonika. This way it cut the Army Eastern Macedonia’s land communications with the rest of the country. Its evacuation by sea was out of question due to lack of ships and the German superiority in the air. In those circumstances the commander of the army, Gen. Konstantinos Bakopoulos, capitulated.

The events on the Bulgarian frontier also decided about the fate of the joint Greco-Yugoslav offensive against the Italians in Albania. The Yugoslav 3rd Army, despite of its weakness, on 7 April undertook offensive operations in the vicinity of the lakes Shkodra in the north and Ohrid in the south, where it co-operated with the Greek Army Western Macedonia. Yet the Germans got to the Yugoslav rears and paralysed the Greco-Yugoslav operation. Only in the northern Albania the Yugoslavs achieved some local successes in the vicinity of Shkodra. Meanwhile on the other sectors of the borders with Bulgaria, Romania, Hungary, Germany and Italy everything was quiet yet – both sides were still concentrating their forces. Only on the Sava German motorized troops seized bridgeheads. The Yugoslav 4th Army counter-attacked to liquidate them, but without a success.

On 8 April the situation rapidly changed: along the axis Sofia – Belgrade struck the German 1st Armoured Group commanded by Gen. Ewald von Kleist. Already on the first day of the advance it broke the defence of the Yugoslav 5th Army and took Pirot. Next day the 11th Armoured Division developed the success and seized Nis, Aleksinac, and reached Rozanj. This strike cut the 5th Army in halves, which became isolated in the mountains. The road to Belgrade was open. In this situation the Yugoslav command decided to move the 6th Army from the Romanian frontier to the eastern bank of Morava in order to create a new defence position along the line Rudnik Mountains – Arandjelovac – Mladenovac – Grocka. The 11th Division meanwhile continued its advance and wedged into the zone of the Yugoslav concentration. On 10 April it took Paracin, Cuprija, Jagodina, and approached Markovec, where it encountered a stout defence of the 18th Infantry Regiment. Those were already Belgrade’s far approaches. Individual Yugoslav units fought gallantly, but without anti-tank and anti- air defence they inevitably had to succumb to the enemy’s joint air and armoured strikes.

Civilians were surprised by the swift pace of the campaign, but everywhere, where time and means permitted, were formed volunteer units to support fighting troops. The Germans in Yugoslavia had to take many towns in heavy street fights. However, there was no power to organize that spontaneous impulse while the army was too disorganized to use that help. One German soldier noted in his diaries:

All the hamlets along on the road to Kragujewatz are simultaneously the reminiscences of hard fights. Aleksinatz, Tschuprija, Jagodina… There was an officers school in Jagodina. The cadets had delivered a stubborn defence. (…) They fought to the last man.

When the Germans approached Kragujevac, defences were hastily built and anti-air guns were placed to fire at blank point. The manager of a local factory summoned his workers and said: Germans are coming. We should show them the traditional Serbian courage. But armed workers could not do much against the tanks. Nevertheless, they conducted precise fire at motorcyclists and infantry. Even eight days after taking Kragujevac by the Germans, fights still lasted there, and the Germans had losses in killed and wounded. In retaliation they shot 7000 city’s inhabitants.

A dangerous crisis meanwhile mounted in western Yugoslavia. In view of the successful advance of the 12th Army as well as internal situation in Yugoslavia the supreme command ordered the 2nd Army to start its advance on Sarajevo without waiting for the units, which were still in the process of concentration. The operation started on 10 April and from the beginning it assumed unexpected dimensions. The German advance became the signal for the fascist elements to raise their heads. The Yugoslav 4th Army, where served a lot of pro-fascist Croats, just disappeared and so the German advanced troops at 19:30 without a trouble entered Zagreb. There, according to a secret agreement concluded yet before the war, the leader of the local ustaši, Col. Slavko Kvaternik, broadcast by the radio the proclamation of so-called Independent State of Croatia (NDH). He called upon the Croats, especially soldiers, to plead allegiance to NDH. Then was broadcast the statement of Dr. Vlatko Maèek (still the deputy prime-minister in the government of Dušan Simoviæ), which supported the declaration of creation of the NDH. Those appeals activized fascist and capitulationist elements in Croatia. They started to take over the administration and demoralize units, where most of the soldiers were the Croats. They ceased fighting with the Germans, and in many cases also disarmed the soldiers of the Serbian nationality.

The events in Croatia isolated Slovenia from the rest of the country. There too fascists and capitulationists declared severance with Belgrade and tried to contact the Germans. The 7th Army, formed mostly of the Slovenes, ceased to exist as a combat unit under the orders of the supreme command.

It was not until 10 April that the Yugoslav Supreme Command, which so far estimated the situation rather optimistically, saw the signs of catastrophe. The orders were issued to all the units to fight without waiting for direct orders from above. Simultaneously it was decided to organize the defence farther in the hinterland and around Belgrade. They counted on the 6th Army’s ability to regroup and halt the enemy advancing from Sofia, and on the 1st and 2nd Armies, which had to withdraw from Bachka and Baranya and strengthen the defence in the south.

The orders though were issued too late. The whole armies cased to exist. On 10 and 11 April German forces, now also actively supported by Hungarian and Italian troops, were running ahead. The centre of gravity of their operations was now Belgrade, to which from the south-east was approaching the 1st Armoured Group with the 11th Armoured Division in front; from the west was advancing the XLVI Corps, and from the nearby Banate – the XLI Corps. The Yugoslavs had a lot of troops around Belgrade, but they were disorganized and without a proper command. On 11 April the 11th Division overcame the 18th Infantry Regiment and took Topola by surprise. Two days later the same division took Ralje.

In those circumstances the commander of the Yugoslav 6th Army decided that a defence of Belgrade would be pointless and ordered withdrawal of his troops to the left bank of the river Topcider. On 12 April at 17:00 the XLI Corps without fights entered into the city, and on the next day the 11th Division reached it from the south-east, and the 8th Infantry Division from the XLVI Corps from the west. The advance of the XLVI Corps driven from the west to the east in between Sava and Drava rivers menaced the flanks and the rears of the retreating 1st and 2nd Armies. The 2nd Army dispersed without a battle, and in the 1st Army only few units managed to get to the southern bank of Sava. Yet the border and fortress units were still holding their positions. Against them on 11 April struck the Hungarian 2nd Army, which after several clashes occupied Bachka and Baranya.

Menwhile ustaši were seizing power in almost whole Croatia. The Germans without a trouble reached Banja Luka, and the Italian 2nd Army entered Ljubljana and met the Germans at Karlovac. The German 2nd Army was developing its advance on Sarajevo. On 13 April the Yugoslav army was practically defeated, although some troops kept fighting. In this situation gen. Simoviæ, while remaining the prime-minister, handed the duties of the chief of staff of the supreme command over to Gen. Danilo Kalafatoviæ, and authorized him to enter negotiations with the Germans concerning a ceasefire. He expected that it would be possible to obtain conditions similar to those, which were granted to France. Gen. Kalafatoviæ assumed his new duties on 14 April at 9:00 and immediately undertook preparations for ceasefire. At 9:30 the supreme command issued the defeatist directive No.179, which played the same role as Pétain’s appeal of 17 June 1940:

In result of defeat on all the fronts, in result of a complete disintegration of our troops in Croatia, Dalmatia and Slovenia, and after a comprehensive examination of our political and military situation we have come to the conclusion, that any further resistance is impossible and may only bring about the unnecessary bloodshed, without any prospect of a success; furthermore as neither our nation nor its military leadership wanted the war, we have resolved (…) to ask the German and Italian commands to cease the hostilities.


In the evening Kalafatoviæ sent his plenipotentiary envoys to the command of the German 2nd Army to undergo ceasefire talks. But on the same day Adolf Hitler, obsessed with the idea of destruction of Yugoslavia as a country, demended an unconditional capitulation. Until then the military operations had to be continued. On 15 April Berlin and Rome recognized the Independent State of Croatia. Also north-eastern parts of Slovenia, so-called Lower Styria and Upper Carinthia, were subordinated to the German administration. Thus started the partitions of Yugoslavia. On the same day the Bulgarian Telegraph Agency issued the following statement:

Today the government of Bulgaria severed diplomatic relations with Yugoslavia. In the note presented to the Yugoslav envoy it has been stated, that such a decision was influenced by following reasons:

  1. Assaults, which the troops of the Yugoslav forces have committed without a reason since the beginning of the current month.
  2. Assaults from the air of the Yugoslav aviation on Bulgarian cities, during which killed were civilians – especially women and children – although Bulgaria was aside the conflict.
  3. The main reason however is that the members of the Yugoslav legation in Sofia maintained contacts with subversive elements, which were preparing riots and a coup d’état.


On 15 April, in result of the partial ceasefire agreement with the commander of the XXXVI Army Corps, the Yugoslav command ordered the commanders of the 2nd Army Group and the 4th Army to cease hostilities. The ceasefire was in effect in the west of the road Zvornik – Sarajevo. Th troops were ordered not to resist the Germans, but not to lay their arms down either. In result in the whole Bosia, north to the line Visegrad – Sarajevo – Bugojno ceased any resistance.

In the afternoon the Yugoslav government held the last conference on the native soil in Niksic. It was resolved that Yugoslavia would not capitulate as a state, but only the armed forces would sign the act of surrender. The king and the govenment had to go to Greece to continue the war abroad; they flew to Greece the same night. The deputy prime-minister Slobodan Jovanoviæ explained it as follows:

If the army capitulates, then Yugoslavia as a state will have no liabilities before the winners. Contrary, if we capitulate as a country, as a state, and the government confirms the capitulation, then this way we will deem ourselves vanquished, and the country and the state will assume certain liabilities before the winners.

On 17 April in the morning a Yugoslav delegation with Dr. Aleksandar Cincar-Markoviæ and Gen Radivoje Jankoviæ in van was trnsported by a German bomber from Sarajevo to Zemun. At 20:00 they were received in the building of the former Czechoslovak embassy in Belgrade by the commander of the German 2nd Army, Gen. Maximilian von Weichs. He announced to the Yugoslav delegation, that Yugoslavia had been defeated, and called upon the delegation to sign the act of unconditional capitulation. They were given half an hour to make any formal remarks concerning the presented text.

The document stated that the Yugoslav armed forces unconditionally capitulated and surrendered. For that the troops had to gather in their respective units, and until the arrival of the Germans the Yugoslav officers were responsible for the order and discipline. Soldiers, who after the surrender left their units would be punished by death. All the weapon and equipment, as well as the archives of the prime- minister, foreign office, army, and navy had to be handed over to the Germans. Soldiers were forbidden to leave the country. It was a brutal dictate, humiliating in its form and contents. The Yugoslav delegation had no choice but to sign it. They did it at 21:00. The ceasefire was in effect since next day, 18 April at 12:00.

On 17 April during a conference in Athens the Yugoslav government issued an appeal to the nation, which stated that Yugoslavia was still in war and would continue the struggle alongside the Allies until the final victory. Meanwhile in Yugoslavia the German, Italian and Hungarian troops began the occupation of the country. On 19 April Bulgarian troops entered into southern Yugoslavia. The rests of the Yugoslav army surrendered or dispersed. On 24 April at 12:00 ceased its existence the Yugoslav Supreme Command. As many as 375,000 soldiers marched into captivity. Some non-Serbs were soon released, so effectively about 200,000 soldiers (90% Serbs) remained prisoners of war.


Conquest of Yugoslavia

First shots were fired yet before the midnight on 5 April 1941: German assault groups attacked several object along the Yugoslav borders. At 2:00 a German engineer group took by surprise the Yugoslav side of the Iron Gate and voided the Yugoslav plan to block the shipping on the Danube. At 5:00 German and Italian air forces set off for the action, and at 5:15 started the German attack on Skopje, Veles and Strumica. At 6:30 first aircraft from the German 4th Air Fleet flew over Belgrade. Συνέχεια

WW2 – Balkan Catastrophe

In October 1940 the British command happened to withdraw some forces from North Africa to give aid to Greece, a rather moral one. The Greeks though proved to be inflexible beyond expectation, they had fought off advanced Italian divisions, driven them back, and close behind them entered Albania. The general situation in the Balkans was worsening week after week and the reinforcement of British expeditionary forces in Greece was becoming an urgent necessity. To the country of the Hellenes had been sent one of two brigades of the 2nd Armoured Division, two infantry divisions and a considerable part of aviation, 50,000 men altogether. A highland rifles brigade had to join them soon. In command was Gen. Henry Maitland Wilson. Συνέχεια

Εκθεση περί της δράσεως των Ευελπίδων 1940-1945


1. Παραμονές του Πολέμου
Λίγες μέρες πριν από τον ύπουλο τορπιλλισμό του Καταδρομικού «Έλλη» από ιταλικό υποβρύχιο, στο λιμάνι της Τήνου (15 Αυγ. 1940) κι’ ενώ τα σύννεφα του πολέμου συσσωρεύονταν απειλητικά στον ουρανό της Ελλάδος, 289 απόφοιτοι Ευέλπιδες ορκίστηκαν (10 Αυγ. 1940) ως Ανθυπολοχαγοί ενώπιον του τότε βασιλιά Γεώργιου Β΄. Ήταν η τάξη του 1940. Δυόμηση δε μήνες αργότερα (παραμονές του πολέμου) φοιτούσαν στη ΣΣΕ τρεις (3) Τάξεις, σύμφωνα με τον ισχύοντα τότε Οργανισμό της:
– Η νεοπροαχθείσα ΙΙΙη Τάξη (από το φθινόπωρο του 1938).
– Η νεοπροαχθείσα ΙΙη Τάξη (322 μαθητές) από 29 Οκτωβρίου 1939.
– Η μόλις εισαχθείσα Ιη Τάξη (326 μαθητές) από 2 Οκτωβρίου 1940.
Υπόψη ότι σε κτίριο της Λεωφόρου Αλεξάνδρας λειτουργούσε ταυτόχρονα και η «Στρατιωτική Σχολή Αξιωματικών Σωμάτων και Υπηρεσιών» (ΣΣΑΣΥ) με 109 συνολικά μαθητές των ειδικοτήτων: Υγειονομικού, Διαχειρίσεως, Στρατολογίας και Αυτοκινήτων. Επίσης δε στις εγκαταστάσεις της Σχολής στρατωνίστηκε από τον Νοέμβριο του ‘40 ο Ουλαμός Εφέδρων Αξιωματικών. Συνέχεια

Ο Ελληνικός Εμφύλιος Πόλεμος 1946-1949

Με τον όρο Ελληνικός Εμφύλιος Πόλεμος 1946-1949 εννοούμε την περίοδο ενόπλων συγκρούσεων που πραγματοποιήθηκαν στην Ελλάδα μεταξύ του Δημοκρατικού Στρατού Ελλάδας (υπό τον έλεγχο του Κομμουνιστικού Κόμματος Ελλάδας) και του Ελληνικού Στρατού. Διήρκεσε από τον Μάρτιο του 1946 έως τον Αύγουστο του 1949 και είχε ως αποτέλεσμα την ήττα των κομμουνιστών ανταρτών. Ο Ελληνικός Εμφύλιος θεωρείται διεθνώς ως η πρώτη πράξη του ψυχρού πόλεμου στη μεταπολεμική ιστορία και ήταν η πολεμική σύγκρουση με τις μεγαλύτερες απώλειες που γνώρισε η χώρα από το 1830 έως σήμερα[5].

Παραδοσιακά σημείο έναρξης του Εμφυλίου Πολέμου θεωρείται η επίθεση ομάδας πρώην ανταρτών του ΕΛΑΣ υπό την ηγεσία του Αλέξη Ρόσιου («Καπετάν Υψηλάντης») στο Σταθμό Χωροφυλακής Λιτοχώρου Πιερίας την νύχτα της 30ης Μαρτίου 1946. Η ομάδα του Ρόσιου σκότωσε 12 χωροφύλακες και εθνοφύλακες και πυρπόλησε τον Σταθμό, ως απάντηση στις εκτελέσεις, διώξεις, εξορίες και φυλακίσεις που υφίσταντο οι πολίτες που ανήκαν στο ΕΑΜ-ΕΛΑΣ μετά τη Συμφωνία της Βάρκιζας. Συνέχεια

The Greek Civil War 1943-1949,

Major Jeffrey Kotora, Marine Corps Command and Staff College, 16 Apr 1985

Since the end of the Second World War, the frequency with which nations have fallen victim to communist insurgencies has not abated. Why have some nations been able to resist while others succumbed to wars of national liberation? The object of this paper is to examine one such conflict with a view towards analyzing the events of the war and the causative factors that made it a successful counterinsurgency.
This study of the Greek Civil War begins with a discussion of the roots of the conflict in the German occupation of Greece in 1941. Included in this discussion is the growth of the resistance and the rise of the Greek communists. The major portion of the paper deals with three separate stages, or «Rounds» of the civil war. The First Round occurred in late 1943 and was an attempt by the communists to eliminate rival resistance groups. The Second Round was precipitated by the overt attempt of the communists to seize control of Greece shortly after liberation by the Allies in late 1944.


Ανταρτικές ομάδες στην Ελλάδα 1941-1944

Ένοπλοι Οργανώσεις Αντιστάσεως,

Ενοπλος έξέγερσις κατά των κατακτητών έξεδηλώθη πολύ πρίν αρχίση ή δράσις των οργανώσεων αντιστάσεως. Τά γεγονότα τής Δράμας καί του Δοξάτου, τά όποια έλαβον χώραν κατά τό τέλος του Σεπτεμβρίου του 1941 δύναται νά θεωρηθούν ώς αυθόρμητος έναρξις τής ενόπλου αντιστάσεως του Ελληνικού λαού κατά των κατακτητών καί Ιδιαιτέρως κατά των Βουλγάρων επιδρομέων. Ή γενομένη ένοπλος έξέγερσις των κατοίκων τής περιοχής Δράμας, συνεπεία έντεχνων ψευδών διαδόσεων τής βουλγαρικής προπαγάνδας περί στασιάσεως του Βουλγαρικού στρατού κλπ., ύπήρξεν ανοργάνωτος καί πρόωρος καί παρά τόν ήρωϊσμόν των κατοίκων άπέτυχεν. Μετά τά ώς ανω γεγονότα, εμφανίσεις ολιγάριθμων ενόπλων ομάδων είς τήν ΰπαιθρον, έσημειώΟησαν είς διάφορα σημεία τής χώρας άπό των άρχων τής ανοίξεως του 1942. ΑΙ ώς άνω ομάδες δέν κατώρθωσαν νά διατηρηθούν έπί πολύ λόγω τής αντιδράσεως τών δυνάμεων των κατακτητών καί τών άρχων ασφαλείας καθ’ ΰσον στερούμενοι δικτύου πληροφοριών, ένέπιπτον ευκόλως είς ενέδρας ή ήναγκάζοντο νά αυτοδιαλυθούν ελλείψει μέσων συντηρήσεως.

Καί αϊ πρώται ομάδες ανταρτών τών μεγάλων οργανώσεων ΕΑΜ καί ΕΔΕΣ δταν έξήλθον είς τήν ϋπαιθρον, τό θέρος του 1942, συνήντησαν τρομεράς δυσχέρειας. Μετά τάς πρώτας συγκρούσεις των ομως μετά τών κατακτητών καί Ιδίως μετά τήν άνατίναξιν τής γέφυρας του Γοργο-ποτάμου (25 Νοεμβρίου 1942) ύπό τών ανταρτών, συνεργαζομένων μετά τών Βρεταννών σαμποτέρ, ή κατάοτασις μετεβλήθη. Αξιωματικοί του Στρατου έξήρχοντο συνεχώς είς τήν ϋπαιθρον καί ένετόσσοντο είς τάς ανταρτικός ομάδας, ενώ ολόκληροι Σταθμοί χωροφυλακής, μετά του οπλισμού των, προσεχώρουν είς ταύτας.  Ενεφανίσθησαν ανταρτικαί ομάδες καί διαφόρων άλλων οργανώσεων καί οϋτω τήν άνοιξιν του 1943 τό ανταρτικόν κίνημα κυριαρχούσε είς όλόκληρον τήν ΰπαιθρον τής χώρας. Συνέχεια

Politics and Military Advice: Lessons from the Campaign in Greece 1941

By Squadron Leader David Stubbs

This paper suggests that the British decision to become involved in Greece, with a token RAF force in November 1940, helped set in train a series of events which ultimately led to the disastrous joint and coalition venture, where the military desire to satisfy the political appetite for grand strategy caused some commanders to ignore their own assessments that intervention was likely to fail without adequate air support. The paper will show how political pressure was applied to the military commanders and how their objections were gradually eroded so that they began to ignore their own rational analysis and come to believe that the impossible was possible, with ruinous consequences in terms of men and equipment. Συνέχεια

Γερμανικές απώλειες στην Ελλάδα το Β’ ΠΠ




Προς τον κ.…………………..
Για πληροφ.: Τμήμα IV/RL/BV-11 Ημ/νία: 26.2.1985
Αξιότιμε κ….
Επί της από 27.11.1984 ερώτησής σας (ενδιάμεση επιστολή μας από 10.1.85), σας πληροφορούμε, ότι σχετικά με την επιθυμία σας να μάθετε τον αριθμό των πεσόντων γερμανών στρατιωτών, μπορούμε να σας βοηθήσουμε μόνον βάσει των δηλώσεων ταφέντων, που έχουμε στο αρχείο μας.
Οι αριθμοί ωστόσο αυτοί δεν μπορούν επ’ουδενί λόγω να είναι δεσμευτικοί, διότι:
α) Στρατιώτες, δηλωθέντες σαν αγνοούμενοι, οι οποίοι δεν έχουν ακόμα επιστρέψει στην πατρίδα τους και οι οποίοι πιθανότατα έχουν πεθάνει, δεν μπορούν να συμπεριληφθούν στους αριθμούς που ακολουθούν*
β) Στρατιώτες που τραυματίσθηκαν στην Ελλάδα, υπέκυψαν στα τραύματά τους και σε τόπους εκτός της επικράτειας της Ελλάδας*
γ) Άγνωστοι στρατιώτες, δηλ. νεκροί που δεν μπορούν πλέον να αναγνωριστούν, δεν μπορούσαν να συμπεριληφθούν, γιατί δεν έχει δηλωθεί η αιτία του θανάτου τους
δ) Και τέλος οι δηλώσεις των ταφέντων που έχουμε, δεν είναι πιθανότατα πλήρεις.
Μπορούμε να σας γνωστοποιήσουμε τους αριθμούς των ονομαστικά γνωστών στρατιωτών, οι οποίοι έχουν ταφεί στα νεκροταφεία πεσόντων στρατιωτών του Διονύσου-Ραπεντόζα και Μάλεμε. Συνέχεια

Πεσόντες και νεκροί: Εμφύλιες συγκρούσεις 1941-1944

Αβδελάς Βασίλειος του Αντωνίου, Ανχης (ΠΖ): Γεννήθηκε στη
Στρώμνιτσα Μακεδονίας το 1897, της Π.Α.Ο. Εκτελέσθηκε, λόγω της ιδιότητάς του ως Αξκού, στη Δράμα στις 10 Οκτωβρίου
Αβραμίδης Γεώργιος του Τρύφωνος, Αντάρτης: Γεννήθηκε στο
Καπνόφυτο Σιντικής Σερρών το 1911, των Ε.Α.Ο. – Π.Α.Ο.
Εκτελέσθηκε στο Λειβαδοχώρι Νιγρίτας στις 10 Οκτωβρίου 1943, σε διατεταγμένη υπηρεσία ευρισκόμενος.
Αβραμίδης Δήμος του Στυλιανού, Αντάρτης: Γεννήθηκε στο
Καπνόφυτο Σιντικής Σερρών το 1905, των Ε.Α.Ο. – Π.Α.Ο.
Φονεύθηκε μαχόμενος στο χωριό Μαυροθάλασσα Νιγρίτας στις 10
Δεκεμβρίου 1943.
Αβραμίδης Ιωάννης του Μιχαήλ, Λοχίας: Γεννήθηκε στην Αθήνα
το 1914, του Φρουραρχείου Θεσσαλονίκης. Συνελήφθη και
εκτελέσθηκε στο Βέρμιο στις 10 Μαρτίου 1944, λόγω της
ιδιότητάς του ως Μ. Υπαξιωματικού.
Αβραμόπουλος Εμμανουήλ του Ιωάννη, Αντάρτης: Γεννήθηκε στην
Ροδόπολη Σερρών το 1905, των Ε.Α.Ο. – Π.Α.Ο. Φονεύθηκε σε
σύγκρουση με τον Ε.Λ.Α.Σ. στο Δίφυλο Ν. Πετριτσίου Σιντικής
στις 10 Νοεμβρίου 1944.
Άγας Ιωάννης του Σωκράτους, Εύζωνος: Γεννήθηκε στην Αθήνα
το 1922, του Ι Τ.Α. Αθηνών. Συνελήφθη στη Νέα Σμύρνη και
εκτελέσθηκε στις 9 Σεπτεμβρίου 1944.
Αγγελάκης Αθανάσιος του Δημητρίου, Αντάρτης: Γεννήθηκε στη
Σησαμιά Βισαλτίας Σερρών το 1902, των Ε.Α.Ο.- Π.Α.Ο.
Συνελήφθη και εκτελέσθηκε στη θέση Τραπέζια Τερπνής στις 20
Νοεμβρίου 1944.
Αγγελάκης Νικόλαος του Αναστασίου, Εύζωνος: Γεννήθηκε στο
Γυμνό Χαλκίδας Ευβοίας το 1918, του ΙΙ Ανεξ. Τάγματος
Ευζώνων Ευβοίας. Συνελήφθη σε μάχη και εκτελέσθηκε στην
Αμάρυνθο Χαλκίδας στις 17 Οκτωβρίου 1944.
Αγγελάκος Αγγελής του Δημητρίου, Εύζωνος: Γεννήθηκε στον
Μυστρά Λακωνίας το 1914, του Τ.Α. Σπάρτης. Τραυματίσθηκε
στη μάχη του Μυστρά στις 11 Οκτωβρίου 1943 και,
διακομισθείς σε πρόχειρο νοσοκομείο, υπέκυψε την επομένη.
Αγγελάρας Αγγελής του Αθανασίου, Εύζωνος: Γεννήθηκε στο
Μαντούδι Χαλκίδας Ευβοίας το 1924, του Τ.Α. Ευβοίας.
Συνελήφθη σε μάχη και εκτελέσθηκε στη μονή Οσίου Δαυΐδ στις
3 Μαρτίου 1944.
Αγγελής Δημήτριος του Νικολάου, Εύζωνος: Γεννήθηκε στην
Αμάρυνθο Ευβοίας το 1916, του ΙΙ Ανεξ. Τάγματος Ευζώνων
Ευβοίας. Φονεύθηκε στη μάχη της Σέττας στις 26 Ιουνίου
Αγγελής Αναστάσιος του Μιχαήλ, Δεκανέας: Γεννήθηκε στην
Αμάρυνθο Χαλκίδας Ευβοίας το 1915, του ΙΙ Ανεξ. Τάγματος
Ευζώνων Ευβοίας. Συνελήφθη σε μάχη και εκτελέσθηκε στη θέση
Άγ. Ασώματοι Αμαρύνθου στις 17 Οκτωβρίου 1944.


Πεσόντες και νεκροί: Εθνική Αντίσταση 1941-1944


Αβραμάκης Ιωάννης του Γεωργίου, Αντάρτης: Γεννήθηκε στον Άγιο Δημήτριο Βισαλτίας Σερρών το 1910, των Ε.Α.Ο. – Π.Α.Ο. Εκτελέσθηκε από τους Βουλγάρους στην οδό Σερρών – Βροντούς στις 29 Σεπτεμβρίου 1944.
Αβραμίδης Αβραάμ του Αναστασίου, Αντάρτης: Γεννήθηκε στο Αχλαδοχώρι Σιντικής Σερρών το 1893, των Ε.Α.Ο. – Π.Α.Ο. Φονεύθηκε σε μάχη με τμήμα του Βουλγαρικού Στρατού στο Κιλκίς στις 4 Νοεμβρίου 1944.
Αβραμίδης Δημήτριος του Κυριάκου, Αντάρτης: Γεννήθηκε στην Τριάδα Σερρών το 1887, των Ε.Α.Ο. – Π.Α.Ο. Εκτελέσθηκε από τμήμα του Βουλγαρικού Στρατού στον Προμαχώνα στις 20 Νοεμβρίου 1944.
Αγγελάκης Άγγελος του Δημητρίου, Αγωνιστής: Γεννήθηκε στη Σησαμιά Σερρών το 1894. Φονεύθηκε σε μάχη κατά των Βουλγάρων στην Τριάδα Σερρών στις 14 Νοεμβρίου 1944.
Αγγελακόπουλος Αθανάσιος του Γεωργίου, Έφ. Ανθτρος: Γεννήθηκε στη Λάρισα το 1906. Συνελήφθη αιχμάλωτος από τους Ιταλούς και μεταφερόμενος στην Ιταλία πνίγηκε στα ύδατα της Κάτω Αδριατικής, όταν τορπιλίσθηκε το ατμόπλοιο Τσιτά Ντι Τζένοβα, στο οποίο επέβαινε, στις 21 Ιανουαρίου 1943.
Αγγελής Ευάγγελος του Παύλου, Αντάρτης: Γεννήθηκε στο Κουτσελιό Ιωαννίνων το 1910, των Ε.Ο.Ε.Α. – Ε.Δ.Ε.Σ. / Αρχηγείο Ηπείρου. Συνελήφθη από τους Γερμανούς, ενώ επέστρεφε στην υπηρεσία του, και εκτελέσθηκε στις 3 Οκτωβρίου 1943.
Αγγελιδάκης Αγγελής του Εμμανουήλ, Αγωνιστής: Γεννήθηκε στο Άνω Μέρος Αμαρίου Ρεθύμνου το 1897, των Ε.Ο.Ε. Ν. Ρεθύμνου. Εκτελέσθηκε από τους Γερμανούς στο Άνω Μέρος στις 22 Αυγούστου 1944.


Πεσόντες και νεκροί: Κομμουνιστικό κίνημα(Δεκεμβριανά) 1944

Αγαπητός Γεώργιος του Εμμανουήλ, Λοχίας: Γεννήθηκε στο Βαθύ Σάμου, της 3 Ελ. Ορ. Ταξιαρχίας. Φονεύθηκε σε μάχη στο Νοσοκομείο Σωτηρία στις 11 Δεκεμβρίου 1944.
Αγγελάκης Κων/νος του Στεφάνου, Τχης (ΠΖ): Γεννήθηκε στη Πλατανιά Πύργου το 1903. Δολοφονήθηκε στο Κολωνάκι Αθηνών στις 3 Δεκεμβρίου 1944.
Αγγελόπουλος Παναγιώτης του Γεωργίου, Εύζωνος: Γεννήθηκε στην Καλαμάτα Μεσσηνίας το 1926, του Ι Συντ. Ευζώνων Αθηνών. Εκτελέσθηκε στη Χωματερή Περιστερίου στις 11 Δεκεμβρίου 1944.
Αγιαννίδης Απόστολος του Ιορδάνη, Αγωνιστής: Γεννήθηκε στα Γιαννιτσά Πέλλας το 1920, των Ε.Ο.Ε. Εκτελέσθηκε στην Άψαλο Αλμωπίας τον Ιανουάριο 1945.
Αγιωργίτης Γρηγόριος του Παναγιώτη, Εύζωνος: Γεννήθηκε στο Άργος Αργολίδας το 1922, του Ι Τάγματος Ευζώνων Αθηνών. Εκτελέσθηκε στην Αθήνα στις 18 Δεκεμβρίου 1944.
Αδαμάκης Ελευθέριος του Γεωργίου, Μόν. Λοχίας: Γεννήθηκε στη Ζήρου Σητείας Λασιθίου το 1919. Εκτελέσθηκε στο χωριό Πέλλας στις 16 Ιανουαρίου 1945, λόγω της ιδιότητάς του ως Μόν. ΥπΑξιωματικού.
Αθανασιάδης Νικόλαος του Δημητρίου, Τχης Διαχ/σεως ε.α.: Γεννήθηκε στο Λαγκάδιο Αρκαδίας το 1892. Συνελήφθη ως όμηρος και πέθανε στη Θήβα την 1 Ιανουαρίου 1945, λόγω των ταλαιπωριών της ομηρίας του.
Αθανασίου Γεώργιος του Αποστόλου, Αγωνιστής: Γεννήθηκε στη Φανερωμένη Φιλιππιάδας Πρέβεζας το 1912, των Ε.Ο.Ε.Α. – Ε.Δ.Ε.Σ. / Αρχηγείο Ηπείρου. Φονεύθηκε στα Μάρμαρα Ιωαννίνων στις 21 Δεκεμβρίου 1944.
Αθανασόπουλος Δημήτριος του Παναγιώτη, Στρατιώτης: Γεννήθηκε στην Αθήνα το 1914, του 148 Τ. Εθν/κής. Πέθανε στο 7ο Αστυν. Τμήμα Θεσ/νίκης στις 2 Φεβρουαρίου, λόγω τραυματισμού του από απροσεξία Άγγλου στρατιώτη.


Αναμνήσεις στην Αθήνα, Την Καρδιά της Αντίστασης, Γιάννης Ιωαννίδης (γ.γ ΚΚΕ)

σελίδες 140-141

Θυμάμαι τή θέση τοΰ Γληνοΰ. Αυτός ιδιαίτερα τόνιζε τά πρόβλημα των βουλγάρων γιατί και περισσότερο άπό όλους αισθανόταν τήν πίεση τών άλλων πάνω σ’ αυτό. Μετά βγήκε καί ή υπόθεση εκείνη, ή προβοκάτσια τών γερμανών μέ τό σύμφωνο Ίωαννίδη – Δασκάλοφ.

Αυτοί θέλαν να τήν πατήσουμε μέ τό Βαλκανικό. Είδαν όμως ότι δεν πέσαμε σέ τέτοια προβοκάτσια, νά κάνουμε Ενα τέτοιο σύμφωνο μέ όλους μαζί. Ή Ίντέλιτζενς Σέρβις τά ήξερε, τά παρακολούθησε όλα αυτά. Άφοϋ λοιπόν είδε ότι άπό έκεΐ δέ βγαίνει τίποτα έπρεπε νά σκαρωθεί κάτι άλλο γιά νά καρφώσουν τόν Ίωαν­νίδη καί σκάρωσαν τό σύμφωνο Ίωαννίδη – Δασκάλοφ. Συνέχεια

Επιμνημόσυνος λόγος υπέρ του ήρωα υπολοχαγού Αλεξάνδρου Διάκου

του αντισυνταγματάρχη Ιωάννη Καραβία
«Αείμνηστε Λοχαγέ Διάκε,

Την 31 ην Οκτωβρίου 1940 ήτανε μια παγερή βραδιά όταν σε συνάντησα στις βουνοπλαγιές της Ζούζουλης, στη διάβαση του Γράβου.
Ήτανε η ώρα 9 το βράδυ- τις κρίσιμες εκείνες στιγμές για την πατρίδα μας- και σκοτεινιά βαριά.
Έτρεξαν όλοι οι αξιωματικοί της διλοχίας του 4ου Συντάγματος που ήρχετο από τα Γρεβενά – προς ενίσχυσιν του αποσπάσματος Δαβάκη- κοντά μου να μάθουν τα νέα.
Ξαφνικά με πιάνει από το χέρι σφιχτά, ένας ψηλός και ωραίος νεαρός αξιωματικός και με ρωτά:
-Κύριε ταγματάρχα δεν είσαι συ ο διμοιρίτης στη Σχολή Ευελπίδων;
Αμέσως ανεγνώρισα το ζωηρό Δωδεκανησόπουλο το λεβεντόκορμο εύελπι Αλέξανδρο Διάκο.
-Ναι εγώ είμαι του απάντησα.
Και γυρίζω προς όλους για να τους καθησυχάσω και τους είπα: Αι επιχειρήσεις πάνε καλά.
-Την ξέρουμε την απάντηση μου απήντησε. Αύριο όμως θα τους δείξουμε των Μακαρονάδων. Και πλησιάζοντάς με στο αυτί μου είπε:
«Μια χάρη θέλω: Να βάλεις εμένα μπροστά..»

Η ιστορία του υπολοχαγού Αλέξανδρου Διάκου, Κ. Τριανταφυλλίδης

ΔΙΑΚΟΣ ΑΛΕΞΑΝΔΡΟΣΟ πρώτος Ελληνας νεκρός αξιωματικός: Αλέξανδρος Διάκος, υπολοχαγός Πεζικού, Δωδεκανήσιος
Η ιστορία της θυσίας γραμμένη από τον Κώστα Τριανταφυλλίδη πολεμικό ανταποκριτή (1940-41)

«Ψηλά πάνω στο Λυκοκρέμασμα, καθώς μεσημέριαζε και ο ουρανός καθάριος πια και ολογάλανος, γελούσε σαν ανοιξιάτικος, και η φάλαγγα ξετυλιγμένη στη βουνοκορφή, συνέχιζε τη γρήγορη πορεία της, αντήχησε ακόμη ψηλότερα, στο δροσερό αέρα, ένα βουητό που ολοένα ζύγωνε και δυνάμωνε. Φτερά μετάλλινα αστράψανε στον ήλιο.

Φαντάροι, πυροβολητές και καβαλλάρηδες, με σηκωμένο το βλέμμα, κοιτούσανε περίεργοι και ανήσυχοι.

-Τι να είναι τάχα; Δικά μας ή εχθρικά;

-Έχουνε σταυρό στην ουρά. ελληνικά είναι!..

-Είναι ιταλικά βομβαρδιστικά, είπε με ήρεμη βεβαιότητα ένας μελαχρινός νέος.

Στις επωμίδες του είχε τα δυο αστέρια του υπολοχαγού και από την ανοιχτή χλαίνη του, στο χιτώνιό του επάνω, φαινότανε το σήμα με τα ανοιχτά φτερά του επίκουρου παρατηρητή. Συνέχεια

Η ιταλική αεροπορία το 1940


Του Γιώργου Χαραλαμπόπουλου

H πρώτη φάση της ιταλικής επίθεσης κατά της Ελλάδας τον Οκτώβριο του 1940 απέτυχε. Στα άγνωστα παρασκήνια της ιταλικής στρατιωτικής ηγεσίας, η ευθύνη βάρυνε ολοκληρωτικά το όπλο της αεροπορίας. Διάφορα ντοκουμέντα, προερχόμενα από τις εκθέσεις και τις αναφορές των Ιταλών στρατηγών, αλλά και από το χώρο
του αεροπορικού τύπου, μας δίνουν την εικόνα της δράσης της Ιταλικής Αεροπορίας και τις ενέργειες της αεροπορικής ηγεσίας.

Σύμφωνα με τις εκθέσεις του αρχηγού των ιταλικών δυνάμεων στην Αλβανία στρατηγού Βισκόντι Πράσκα, η επίθεση κατά της Ελλάδας προέβλεπε τέσσερις βασικές ενέργειες. Επιχειρήσεις στα ελληνικά σύνορα, κατάληψη της Κέρκυρας, μαζική αεροπορική δράση και συγκέντρωση και προώθηση των ενισχύσεων. Από αυτές, ενώ οι επιχειρήσεις άρχισαν ευνοϊκά, ούτε η Κέρκυρα καταλήφθηκε, ούτε ενισχύσεις συγκεντρώθηκαν. Συνέχεια

Ιερός Λόχος (1942 – 1945)

Ο Ιερός Λόχος συγκροτήθηκε το Σεπτέμβριο του 1942 στη Μέση Ανατολή με την αρχική ονομασία «Λόχος Επιλέκτων Αθανάτων», από εθελοντές αξιωματικούς όλων των Κλάδων των Ελληνικών Ενόπλων Δυνάμεων και των Σωμάτων Ασφαλείας, που διέφυγαν από την υπόδουλη Ελλάδα.  Σκοπός τους ήταν να πολεμήσουν τα στρατεύματα του Άξονα και να συμβάλουν στην απελευθέρωση της Πατρίδας.  Προσωρινός Διοικητής ορίστηκε ο Επίλαρχος Αντώνιος Στεφανάκης.

Στις 15 Σεπτεμβρίου ανέλαβε τη διοίκηση του Λόχου ο Συνταγματάρχης Χριστόδουλος Τσιγάντες. Με ενέργειά του μετονομάστηκε η μονάδα σε «Ιερός Λόχος», καθιερώθηκε ιδιαίτερο έμβλημα με τη ρήση «Η ΤΑΝ Η ΕΠΙ ΤΑΣ» και άρχισε η εκπαίδευσή του στις καταδρομικές επιχειρήσεις.

Το πρώτο τμήμα του Ιερού Λόχου που έλαβε μέρος σε καταδρομικές επιχειρήσεις, ήταν μια ομάδα από 8 αξιωματικούς, με επικεφαλής τον Αντισμήναρχο Αλεξανδρή Γεώργιο, το οποίο έδρασε από 17 Νοεμβρίου 1942 μέχρι 27 Ιανουαρίου 1943 στην Κυρηναϊκή. Συνέχεια

Αντιστασιακές οργανώσεις 1941 – 1944

Η ελληνική Εθνική Αντίσταση άρχισε από τις πρώτες ημέρες της εχθρικής κατοχής. Αναπτύχθηκε βαθμιαία με τη δημιουργία αντιστασιακών οργανώσεων, οι οποίες αρχικά δρούσαν ως οργανώσεις πληροφοριών – δολιοφθορών, κυρίως στην περιοχή των Αθηνών. Μετέπειτα με τη δημιουργία ένοπλων ομάδων, εμφανίστηκε ο αντάρτικος στρατός με ευρύτερη παρουσία και δράση στην ύπαιθρο.

Οι κυριότερες Ένοπλες Αντιστασιακές Οργανώσεις (ΕΑΟ) ήταν:

1.    ο ΕΔΕΣ (Ελληνικός Δημοκρατικός Εθνικός Στρατός) με τη στρατιωτική του οργάνωση ΕΟΕΑ (Εθνικές Ομάδες Ελλήνων Ανταρτών),

2.    το ΕΑΜ (Ελληνικό Απελευθερωτικό Μέτωπο) με τη στρατιωτική του οργάνωση ΕΛΑΣ (Ελληνικός Λαϊκός Απελευθερωτικός Στρατός),

3.    η ΕΚΚΑ (Εθνική Και Κοινωνική Απελευθέρωση) που συγκρότησε το 5/42 Σύνταγμα. Συνέχεια

Τάγματα Ευζώνων – Τάγματα Ασφαλείας: Μύθοι και Πραγματικότητα, Μ. Μανωλέας

Τα «Τάγματα Ευζώνων» και τα «Τάγματα Εθελοντικής Χωροφυλακής -Τάγματα Ασφαλείας» είναι από τις πλέον αισχρά συκοφαντημένες στρατιωτικές μονάδες στην ιστορία της χώρας μας. Η δράση των σχηματισμών αυτών,όπως και άλλα συμβάντα της ιστορίας του Β’ Π.Π, πήρε διαστάσεις τις οποίες δεν είχε .

Τα «Ευζωνικά Τάγματα», ήσαν μονάδες πιστές στην κυβέρνηση της χώρας με αποστολή την αντιμετώπιση της επικείμενη αναρχίας και μόνο. Κατηγορήθηκαν ως συνεργάτες και «συμπλήρωμα» των αρχών κατοχής. Ωστόσο η αξία τους για τις δυνάμεις της Βέρμαχτ είναι συζητήσιμο μέγεθος. Οι γερμανικές δυνάμεις δεν είχαν σοβαρή αντίσταση από τους αντάρτες του Ε.ΛΑ.Σ.. Δεν επεδίωξαν την δημιουργία των εν λόγω σχηματισμών. Σε πολλές μάλιστα περιπτώσεις τους έβλεπαν με δυσπιστία. Αντιθέτως η Ελληνική κυβέρνηση των Αθηνών, έθεσε απαραίτητο όρο υπάρξεως της, την δημιουργία των «Ταγμάτων ευζώνων». Η ορατή αποχώρηση των δυνάμεων κατοχής και το γεγονός ότι μέχρι να φτάσουν ελληνικές στρατιωτικές δυνάμεις από την Μ. Ανατολή, θα χρειαζόταν απαραίτητα ένα εύλογο χρονικό διάστημα, καθιστούσε αναγκαία την ύπαρξη συγκροτημένων σωμάτων που θα αναχαίτιζαν τους συμμορίτες.
Αυτή την αποστολή εκτέλεσαν με επιτυχία τα Τ.Ε. και τα Τ.Α. Συνέχεια